Home/Get Matched/NCT04124120
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Comparing Single arterial graft with Multiple arterial grafting for heart diseases

Official title: Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women

Randomized Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women (ROMA:Women) Trial

Condition: Heart DiseasesSponsor: Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityTarget enrollment: 2300
  • 2 groups
  • Sites in Montreal, New Westminster and 9 more cities
  • Recruiting
Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, OntarioHopital Sacre-Coeur, MontrealFraser Clinical Trials, New WestminsterMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, AlbertaSt. Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, ManitobaHorizon Health Network - Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, New BrunswickNewfoundland and Labrador Health Services, St. John's, Newfoundland and LabradorHealth Sciences North, Greater Sudbury, OntarioHamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, OntarioLondon Health Sciences, London, OntarioUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, OntarioSunnybrook Health Sciences, Toronto, OntarioMontreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QuebecUniversity Hospital of Montreal, Montreal, QuebecRoyal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec

Interventions

  • Medical procedure

    Single arterial graft

    This interventions consists of patients receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. In addition to the left internal thoracic artery patients will receive venous grafts for all additional grafting.

  • Medical procedure

    Multiple arterial grafting

    This intervention consists of the patient receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. The second arterial graft (right internal thoracic artery or radial artery) will be directed to the major branch of the circumflex. Additional grafts will include saphenous veins or arterial conduits.

Canadian Sites (16)

15 of 16 recruiting

  • Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta

    Recruiting
  • St. Boniface General Hospital

    Winnipeg, Manitoba

    Recruiting
  • Hopital Sacre-Coeur

    Montreal

    Recruiting

Eligibility Criteria

See who this study is looking for15 criteria

The trial’s own eligibility text, word for word from the registry. Only the trial site can say who takes part.

Inclusion

  • +Women patients ≥18 years old.
  • +Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
  • +Significant disease of the left main coronary artery or of the left anterior descending and the circumflex coronary system with or without disease of the right coronary artery.
  • +Primary (first time) cardiac surgery procedure.

Exclusion

  • Male gender
  • Single graft
  • Emergency operation
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%
  • Any concomitant cardiac or non-cardiac procedure
  • Preoperative severe end-organ dysfunction (dialysis, liver failure, respiratory failure), cancer or any co-morbidity that reduces life expectancy to less than 5 years.
  • Inability to use the saphenous vein or to use both radial and right internal thoracic arteries
  • Anticipated need for coronary thrombo-endarterectomy
  • Planned hybrid revascularization
  • Myocardial infarction within 72 hours of surgery
  • Previous cardiac surgery
5 concepts to explore on this page · up to 1,300 pointsTap any term to learn what it means.

In plain language

Assembled directly from this trial’s registry record. Every sentence traces to a field below — nothing here is generated or interpreted.

Learning 
What this study is

This study is testing a treatment for a condition.

This study is not organised into the usual phase numbers — that is common for device, behavioural, and diagnostic research.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.designInfo.primaryPurpose
  • designModule.phases
Who receives what

There are 2 groups in this study.

Group A receives Single arterial graft.

Registry label: A: Single Arterial Graft (SAG) group

Group B receives Multiple arterial grafting.

Registry label: B: Multiple Arterial Graft (MAG) group

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].label
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
How the study is run

Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.

One group of people involved — usually the participants — is not told which treatment is which.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.designInfo.allocation
  • designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
Is there a placebo?

This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
Who the study is looking for

The study lists a minimum age of 18 years, with no upper limit given.

The study lists female participants only.

The study does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.

These are the criteria the study lists. Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.sex
  • eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How big and how long

The study aims to enrol about 2,300 people.

The study is currently expected to finish around March 2030.

The main measurement is taken over: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-upFollow-upContinued check-ins after the treatment part is finished.Read more →.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
  • statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
What the study measures

Primary outcomePrimary endpointThe single main question the study is designed to answer.Read more → for aim 1: Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure — measured over Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-upFollow-upContinued check-ins after the treatment part is finished.Read more →.

Primary outcome for aim 2: Disease-specific quality of life — measured over Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].measure
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame

Source: NCT04124120 on ClinicalTrials.gov. The full registry text is further down this page — this summary never replaces it.

Not medical advice. What do these terms mean?

What is being tested — in plain terms

About Single arterial graftProcedure

This interventions consists of patients receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. In addition to the left internal thoracic artery patients will receive venous grafts for all additional grafting.

From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.

What a procedure is here: A surgery, technique or clinical procedure being studied.

Read the full explanation → · in clinical review

About Multiple arterial graftingProcedure

This intervention consists of the patient receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. The second arterial graft (right internal thoracic artery or radial artery) will be directed to the major branch of the circumflex. Additional grafts will include saphenous veins or arterial conduits.

From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.

What a procedure is here: A surgery, technique or clinical procedure being studied.

Read the full explanation → · in clinical review

Common questions

Answered from this trial’s registry record. Where the record doesn’t say, these answers say so rather than filling the gap.

Am I eligible for this trial?

Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part. Concord cannot make that determination, and neither can any tool that has not examined you.

What the study lists: a minimum age of 18 years.

The full inclusionInclusion criteriaThe things you must have or be for a study to consider you.Read more → and exclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaThe things that would prevent someone from taking part.Read more → are published on this page, exactly as the study team wrote them.

The useful next step is to bring this trial to your doctor. Answering a few questions first gives them something concrete to review.

From the trial registry
  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.eligibilityCriteria
Is there a placebo?

This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.

From the trial registry
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
Would I know which treatment I am getting?

One group of people involved — usually the participants — is not told which treatment is which.

Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.

From the trial registry
  • designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
  • designModule.designInfo.allocation
Who can join?

The study lists a minimum age of 18 years, with no upper limit given.

It lists female participants only.

It does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.

Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can confirm whether a particular person can take part.

From the trial registry
  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.sex
  • eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How long would this take?

The study's main measurement is taken over: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-upFollow-upContinued check-ins after the treatment part is finished.Read more →.

The study as a whole is currently expected to finish around 2030-03.

How long any one person takes part can differ from the study length. The study team can tell you what the schedule looks like in practice.

From the trial registry
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
  • statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
How many people are taking part?

The study aims to enrol about 2,300 people.

From the trial registry
  • designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
Where is this happening?

This study lists 18 locations, including: Montreal, Canada; New Westminster, Canada; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada; St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, and 12 more.

Sites can open and close during a study, so confirm with the team before travelling.

From the trial registry
  • trial_locations

About This Trial

The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grafting (SAG). The specific aims of ROMA:Women are: Aim 1: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important clinical and surgical subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated. The women enrolled in the ongoing ROMA trial (anticipated to be approximately 690) will be included in ROMA:Women, increasing efficiency and reducing enrollment time. Hypothesis 1.0. MAG will reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Hypothesis 1.1. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups. Aim 2: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on generic and disease-specific QOL, physical and mental health symptoms in women undergoing CABG. The investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (including those enrolled in ROMA:QOL). Differences by important subgroups (as defined above) will also be evaluated. Hypothesis 2.0. MAG will improve generic and disease-specific QOL compared to SAG. Hypothesis 2.1. MAG will improve physical and mental health symptoms compared to SAG. Hypothesis 2.2. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.

Other Sites (7)

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Lenox Hill Hospital

New York, New York, United States

New York Presbyterian Queens

Queens, New York, United States

Think this trial might be right for you?

Complete a quick intake form and we will match you with this and other relevant trials based on your medical profile.

See if this trial could fit you

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility can only be determined by the trial site after proper screening. Trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and may not reflect the most current status. Always consult your healthcare provider before making decisions about clinical trial participation.