Testing Error Augmentation Feedback with No Error Augmentation Feedback against a placebo for stroke hemorrhagic
Official title: The Role of Cognition in Motor Learning After Stroke
The Role of Cognition in the Use of Enhanced Intrinsic Feedback for Motor Learning After Stroke
- 2 groups
- One site, in Laval
- Recruiting
Interventions
- Behavioural therapy
Error Augmentation Feedback
Error augmentation (EA) is a feedback modality that provides subjects with magnified motor errors. In our intervention, subjects are provided with an elbow angle error that will encourage subjects to use more elbow extension during reaching. Thus, subjects are provided with feedback that their elbow has extended less than it actually has and will compensate by extending the elbow further to successfully reach a target. Subjects will receive an elbow flexion error of 15 degrees to encourage elbow extension.
- Behavioural therapy
No Error Augmentation Feedback
Error augmentation (EA) is a feedback modality that provides subjects with magnified motor errors. In our intervention, subjects are provided with an elbow angle error that will encourage subjects to use more elbow extension during reaching. Thus, subjects are provided with feedback that their elbow has extended less than it actually has and will compensate by extending the elbow further to successfully reach a target. In this case, subjects that do not receive EA feedback will act as sham comparators.
Canadian Sites (1)
1 of 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital
Laval, Quebec
Eligibility Criteria
See who this study is looking for9 criteria
The trial’s own eligibility text, word for word from the registry. Only the trial site can say who takes part.
Inclusion
- +Have armArmOne of the groups in a study, each receiving something different.Read more → paresis (Chedoke-McMaster Arm Scale 2-6/7) and spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale ≥ 1/4) but can voluntarily flex/extend the elbow to approximately 30 degrees in each direction.
- +Sustained a first cortical/sub-cortical ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke less than 3 years previously and are medically stable.
- +Are no longer receiving treatment.
- +Normal or corrected-to-normal vision.
Exclusion
- −Other major neurological or musculoskeletal problems that may interfere with task performance.
- −Marked elbow proprioceptive deficits (\<6/12 Fugl-Meyer UL sensation scale) that may interfere with elbow position perception.
- −Visuospatial neglect (Line Bisection Test deviation \> 6 mm).
- −Uncorrected vision.
- −Depression (≥ 14 Beck Depression Inventory II).
In plain language
Assembled directly from this trial’s registry record. Every sentence traces to a field below — nothing here is generated or interpreted.
What this study is
This study is testing a treatment for a condition.
This study is not organised into the usual phase numbers — that is common for device, behavioural, and diagnostic research.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- designModule.designInfo.primaryPurpose
- designModule.phases
Who receives what
There are 2 groups in this study.
Group A receives Error Augmentation Feedback.
Registry label: A: Training with EA feedback
Group B, the shamSham procedureA procedure made to feel like the real one, without the active step.Read more → group, receives No Error Augmentation Feedback.
Registry label: B: Training without EA feedback
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].label
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
How the study is run
Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.
Neither you nor the study team would know which group you are in until the study ends.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- designModule.designInfo.allocation
- designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
Is there a placebo?
One group receives a sham procedureSham procedureA procedure made to feel like the real one, without the active step.Read more → — one made to feel like the real thing but without the active step.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
Who the study is looking for
The study lists an age range of 40 years to 75 years.
The study is open to people of any sex.
The study does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.
These are the criteria the study lists. Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- eligibilityModule.minimumAge
- eligibilityModule.maximumAge
- eligibilityModule.sex
- eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How big and how long
The study aims to enrol about 24 people.
The study is currently expected to finish around July 2026.
The main measurement is taken over: Change in endpointEndpointThe specific thing a study measures to answer its question.Read more → error is assessed before the start of training and after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 9 weeks. The change in endpoint error is assessed again 4 weeks after the completion of training.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
- statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
What the study measures
Change in endpointEndpointThe specific thing a study measures to answer its question.Read more → error — measured over Change in endpoint error is assessed before the start of training and after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 9 weeks. The change in endpoint error is assessed again 4 weeks after the completion of training.
Change in movement time — measured over Change in movement time is assessed before the start of training and after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 9 weeks. The change in movement time is assessed again 4 weeks after the completion of training.
Change in path straightness — measured over Change in path straightness is assessed before the start of training and after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 9 weeks. The change in path straightness is assessed again 4 weeks after the completion of training.
Change in path smoothness — measured over Change in path straightness is assessed before the start of training and after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 9 weeks. The change in path smoothness is assessed again 4 weeks after the completion of training.
The study lists 2 further main measurements.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].measure
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
Source: NCT05268861 on ClinicalTrials.gov. The full registry text is further down this page — this summary never replaces it.
Not medical advice. What do these terms mean?
What is being tested — in plain terms
About Error Augmentation FeedbackBehavioural
Error augmentation (EA) is a feedback modality that provides subjects with magnified motor errors. In our intervention, subjects are provided with an elbow angle error that will encourage subjects to use more elbow extension during reaching. Thus, subjects are provided with feedback that their elbow has extended less than it actually has and will compensate by extending the elbow further to successfully reach a target. Subjects will receive an elbow flexion error of 15 degrees to encourage elbow extension.
From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.
What a behavioural is here: A programme, therapy, education, or lifestyle approach being studied.
Read the full explanation → · in clinical review
About No Error Augmentation FeedbackBehavioural
Error augmentation (EA) is a feedback modality that provides subjects with magnified motor errors. In our intervention, subjects are provided with an elbow angle error that will encourage subjects to use more elbow extension during reaching. Thus, subjects are provided with feedback that their elbow has extended less than it actually has and will compensate by extending the elbow further to successfully reach a target. In this case, subjects that do not receive EA feedback will act as sham comparators.
From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.
What a behavioural is here: A programme, therapy, education, or lifestyle approach being studied.
Read the full explanation → · in clinical review
Common questions
Answered from this trial’s registry record. Where the record doesn’t say, these answers say so rather than filling the gap.
Am I eligible for this trial?
Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part. Concord cannot make that determination, and neither can any tool that has not examined you.
What the study lists: an age range of 40 years to 75 years.
The full inclusionInclusion criteriaThe things you must have or be for a study to consider you.Read more → and exclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaThe things that would prevent someone from taking part.Read more → are published on this page, exactly as the study team wrote them.
The useful next step is to bring this trial to your doctor. Answering a few questions first gives them something concrete to review.
From the trial registry
- eligibilityModule.minimumAge
- eligibilityModule.maximumAge
- eligibilityModule.eligibilityCriteria
Is there a placebo?
This study includes a shamSham procedureA procedure made to feel like the real one, without the active step.Read more → comparison — a procedure made to feel like the real one, without the active step.
From the trial registry
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
Would I know which treatment I am getting?
Neither you nor the study team would know which group you are in until the study ends.
Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.
From the trial registry
- designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
- designModule.designInfo.allocation
Who can join?
The study lists an age range of 40 years to 75 years.
It is open to people of any sex.
It does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.
Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can confirm whether a particular person can take part.
From the trial registry
- eligibilityModule.minimumAge
- eligibilityModule.maximumAge
- eligibilityModule.sex
- eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How long would this take?
The study's main measurement is taken over: Change in endpointEndpointThe specific thing a study measures to answer its question.Read more → error is assessed before the start of training and after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 9 weeks. The change in endpoint error is assessed again 4 weeks after the completion of training..
The study as a whole is currently expected to finish around 2026-07.
How long any one person takes part can differ from the study length. The study team can tell you what the schedule looks like in practice.
From the trial registry
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
- statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
How many people are taking part?
The study aims to enrol about 24 people.
From the trial registry
- designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
Where is this happening?
This study lists one location: Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Sites can open and close during a study, so confirm with the team before travelling.
From the trial registry
- trial_locations
About This Trial
Stroke leads to lasting problems in using the upper limb (UL) for everyday life activities. While rehabilitation programs depend on motor learning, UL recovery is less than ideal. Implicit learning is thought to lead to better outcomes than explicit learning. Cognitive factors (e.g., memory, attention, perception), essential to implicit motor learning, are often impaired in people with stroke. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of cognitive deficits on implicit motor learning in people with stroke. The investigators hypothesize that 1) subjects with stroke will achieve better motor learning when training with additional intrinsic feedback compared to those who train without additional intrinsic feedback, and 2) individuals with stroke who have cognitive deficits will have impairments in their ability to use feedback to learn a motor skill compared to individuals with stroke who do not have cognitive deficits. A recent feedback modality, called error augmentation (EA), can be used to enhance motor learning by providing subjects with magnified motor errors that the nervous system can use to adapt performance. The investigators will use a custom-made training program that includes EA feedback in a virtual reality (VR) environment in which the range of the UL movement is related to the patient's specific deficit in the production of active elbow extension. An avatar depiction of the arm will include a 15 deg elbow flexion error to encourage subjects to increase elbow extension beyond the current limitations. Thus, the subject will receive feedback that the elbow has extended less than it actually has and will compensate by extending the elbow further. Subjects will train for 30 minutes with the EA program 3 times a week for 9 weeks. Kinematic and clinical measures will be recorded before, after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 9 weeks. Four weeks after the end of training, there will be a follow-up evaluation. Imaging scans will be done to determine lesion size and extent, and descending tract integrity with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This study will identify if subjects with cognitive deficits benefit from individualized training programs using enhanced intrinsic feedback. The development of treatments based on mechanisms of motor learning can move rehabilitation therapy in a promising direction by allowing therapists to design more effective interventions for people with problems using their upper limb following a stroke.
Think this trial might be right for you?
Complete a quick intake form and we will match you with this and other relevant trials based on your medical profile.
See if this trial could fit youThis page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility can only be determined by the trial site after proper screening. Trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and may not reflect the most current status. Always consult your healthcare provider before making decisions about clinical trial participation.