Home/Get Matched/NCT05660031
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Comparing LHB Tenotomy with LHB Tenodesis for supraspinatus tear

Official title: Treatment of the Biceps With Concomitant Supraspinatus Tears

Treatment of the Biceps With Concomitant Supraspinatus Tears: A Multicenter Pragmatic Three-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Surgical Trial

Condition: Supraspinatus TearSponsor: La Tour HospitalTarget enrollment: 180
  • 3 groups
  • One site, in Calgary
  • Recruiting
Group 23 Sports Medicine, Calgary, Alberta

Interventions

  • Medical procedure

    LHB Tenotomy

    Will be performed arthroscopically by cutting the LHB at its origin with arthroscopic scissors

  • Medical procedure

    LHB Tenodesis

    "ill be performed arthroscopically with a tenodesis at the top of the articular margin using an onlay technique.

Canadian Sites (1)

1 of 1 recruiting

  • Group 23 Sports Medicine

    Calgary, Alberta

    Recruiting

Eligibility Criteria

See who this study is looking for11 criteria

The trial’s own eligibility text, word for word from the registry. Only the trial site can say who takes part.

Inclusion

  • +Patient voluntarily consents to participate in the study and has the mental and physical ability to participate in the study, fill out subjective questionnaires, return for follow-upFollow-upContinued check-ins after the treatment part is finished.Read more → visits, and comply with prescribed post-operative physical therapy.
  • +Full thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon
  • +Intact subscapularis tendon
  • +Primary rotator cuff repair

Exclusion

  • Previous full thickness biceps tear
  • Infection and neuropathic joints
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  • Patients incapable of judgement or under tutelage
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, contraindication for MRI scan etc.
  • EnrolmentEnrolmentThe number of participants a study plans to include, or has included.Read more → of the investigatorPrincipal investigatorThe doctor or researcher responsible for running the study at a site.Read more →, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
  • Patient declines to participate in study
5 concepts to explore on this page · up to 1,300 pointsTap any term to learn what it means.

In plain language

Assembled directly from this trial’s registry record. Every sentence traces to a field below — nothing here is generated or interpreted.

Learning 
What this study is

This study is testing a treatment for a condition.

This study is not organised into the usual phase numbers — that is common for device, behavioural, and diagnostic research.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.designInfo.primaryPurpose
  • designModule.phases
Who receives what

There are 3 groups in this study.

Group A receives no study treatment and is followed for comparison.

Registry label: A: Leaving LHB Intact

Group B receives LHB Tenotomy.

Registry label: B: LHB tenotomy

Group C receives LHB Tenodesis.

Registry label: C: LHB Tenodesis

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].label
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
How the study is run

Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.

One group of people involved — usually the participants — is not told which treatment is which.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.designInfo.allocation
  • designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
Is there a placebo?

This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.

One group receives no study treatment at all, and is followed for comparison.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
Who the study is looking for

The study lists an age range of 50 years to 80 years.

The study is open to people of any sex.

The study does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.

These are the criteria the study lists. Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.maximumAge
  • eligibilityModule.sex
  • eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How big and how long

The study aims to enrol about 180 people.

The study is currently expected to finish around June 2026.

The main measurement is taken over: At 24 post-operative months.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
  • statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
What the study measures

ASES score — measured over At 24 post-operative months.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].measure
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame

Source: NCT05660031 on ClinicalTrials.gov. The full registry text is further down this page — this summary never replaces it.

Not medical advice. What do these terms mean?

What is being tested — in plain terms

About LHB TenotomyProcedure

Will be performed arthroscopically by cutting the LHB at its origin with arthroscopic scissors

From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.

What a procedure is here: A surgery, technique or clinical procedure being studied.

Read the full explanation → · in clinical review

About LHB TenodesisProcedure

"ill be performed arthroscopically with a tenodesis at the top of the articular margin using an onlay technique.

From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.

What a procedure is here: A surgery, technique or clinical procedure being studied.

Read the full explanation → · in clinical review

Common questions

Answered from this trial’s registry record. Where the record doesn’t say, these answers say so rather than filling the gap.

Am I eligible for this trial?

Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part. Concord cannot make that determination, and neither can any tool that has not examined you.

What the study lists: an age range of 50 years to 80 years.

The full inclusionInclusion criteriaThe things you must have or be for a study to consider you.Read more → and exclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaThe things that would prevent someone from taking part.Read more → are published on this page, exactly as the study team wrote them.

The useful next step is to bring this trial to your doctor. Answering a few questions first gives them something concrete to review.

From the trial registry
  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.maximumAge
  • eligibilityModule.eligibilityCriteria
Is there a placebo?

This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.

One group receives no study treatment and is followed for comparison.

From the trial registry
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
Would I know which treatment I am getting?

One group of people involved — usually the participants — is not told which treatment is which.

Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.

From the trial registry
  • designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
  • designModule.designInfo.allocation
Who can join?

The study lists an age range of 50 years to 80 years.

It is open to people of any sex.

It does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.

Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can confirm whether a particular person can take part.

From the trial registry
  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.maximumAge
  • eligibilityModule.sex
  • eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How long would this take?

The study's main measurement is taken over: At 24 post-operative months.

The study as a whole is currently expected to finish around 2026-06-01.

How long any one person takes part can differ from the study length. The study team can tell you what the schedule looks like in practice.

From the trial registry
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
  • statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
How many people are taking part?

The study aims to enrol about 180 people.

From the trial registry
  • designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
Where is this happening?

This study lists 2 locations, including: Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.

Sites can open and close during a study, so confirm with the team before travelling.

From the trial registry
  • trial_locations

About This Trial

The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is thought to be a common source of shoulder pain and dysfunction in patients with rotator cuff pathology. Tenotomy and tenodesis have been shown to produce favourable and comparable results in treating LHB lesions, but a controversy still exists regarding the treatment of choice. Some suggest that tenotomy should be reserved for older, low-demand patients, while tenodesis should be performed in younger patients and those who engage in heavy labor. Proponents of tenotomy suggest that this is a technically easy procedure that leads to easy rehabilitation and fast return to activity with a low complication and reoperation rate. However, those who support LHB tenodesis list good preservation of elbow flexion and supination strength, improvement of functional scores, elimination of pain, and avoidance of cosmetic deformity as benefits of the procedure. Alternatively, the LHB can be maintained in the joint without tenodesis or tenotomy. In fact, it has not been clearly shown that LHB tenodesis or tenotomy leads to improved outcomes compared to leaving the biceps tendon intact.

Other Sites (1)

Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Think this trial might be right for you?

Complete a quick intake form and we will match you with this and other relevant trials based on your medical profile.

See if this trial could fit you

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility can only be determined by the trial site after proper screening. Trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and may not reflect the most current status. Always consult your healthcare provider before making decisions about clinical trial participation.