Home/Get Matched/NCT06832852
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Comparing 3 approaches for low back pain

Official title: Which Model of Care is the Most Cost-effective in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disorders?

Is a Stepped Model of Care Cost-effective Compared to Usual Care for Musculoskeletal Disorders? a Randomized Controlled Trial

Condition: Low Back PainSponsor: Laval UniversityTarget enrollment: 369
  • 3 groups
  • One site, in Québec
  • Recruiting
Centre for interdisciplinary research in rehabilitation and social integration (Cirris), Québec, Quebec

Interventions

  • Other intervention

    Stepped care

    During the first education session, participants will be provided with information pertaining to painful area, basic pain science, injury specific advice on load management, pain and activity management, lifestyle factors and physical activity. A general physical activity will be recommended (150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week). Then, participants will be directed to a website developed by the research team and patient partners. The website includes explanations of the various topics discussed during the session , explanatory videos, and summarized information. During the second educational session, the participant's condition will be reviewed, and their understanding of the topics covered in the first session and on the website will be assessed. A follow-up on the website will also be conducted. The physiotherapist will then answer the participant's questions and provide personalized advice based on their condition, along with long-term recommendations.

  • Other intervention

    Rehabilitation Care

    The pragmatic rehabilitation program will include exercises aimed at improving strength, endurance, flexibility, capacity to sustain mechanical load and dynamic control. Manual therapy may be provided during the sessions, based on pragmatic clinical decision-making. Participants will also receive information pertaining to the painful area and advice on pain and load management, and on activity modification, integrated across the sessions.

  • Other intervention

    Medical Care

    The pragmatic medical intervention may include pharmacological management, education, physiotherapy referral or referral to a specialist as deemed necessary.

Canadian Sites (1)

1 of 1 recruiting

  • Centre for interdisciplinary research in rehabilitation and social integration (Cirris)

    Québec, Quebec

    Recruiting

Eligibility Criteria

See who this study is looking for17 criteria

The trial’s own eligibility text, word for word from the registry. Only the trial site can say who takes part.

Inclusion

  • +present with one of the four targeted MSKDs (low back pain, neck pain, anterior knee pain, rotator cuff-related shoulder pain).
  • +have had pain for at least 6 weeks.
  • +For anterior knee pain : 1) anterior knee pain during walking, running or going up or down stairs, or during at least two activities among: kneeling, squatting, and resisted knee extension, 2) maximum score of 79 on the KOS-ADL.
  • +For rotator cuff-related shoulder pain : 1) minimal score of 15 on the QuickDASH, and 2) shoulder pain attributed to a rotator cuff-related shoulder pain using diagnostic guidelines of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society.
  • +For low back pain (LBP): 1) non-specific LBP with or without radiation to the lower limbs, 2) minimal score of 15 on the ODI.
  • +For neck pain : 1) non-specific neck pain with or without radiation to the upper limbs, 2) minimal score of 21 on the NDI.

Exclusion

  • Unavailable to participate during the 24 weeks of the study.
  • Do not understand French or English.
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid, inflammatory or neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Received a corticosteroid injection in the previous 3 months.
  • Cognitive problems interfering (Mini-Mental State Examination ≥ 24).
  • Received a corticosteroid injection in the previous 3 months.
  • Less than 6 weeks since an intervention for their condition (including performing prescribed condition-specific exercises or taking prescribed medication).
  • For low back pain (LBP): 1) LBP related to specific conditions (e.g., vertebral fracture, infections, neuropathic pain \[\>4 at the DN4 questionnaire\]), 2) history of spine surgery or signs of upper motor neuron lesions (bilateral paresthesia, hyperreflexia or spasticity)..
  • For neck pain : 1) neck pain related to specific conditions (e.g.; vertebral fracture, infections, neuropathic pain \[\>4 at the DN4 questionnaire\]), 2) history of spine surgery or signs of upper motor neuron lesions.
  • For anterior knee pain : 1) history of knee surgery or patellar dislocation, 2) pain believed to originate either from meniscus or from any knee ligament.
  • For rotator cuff-related shoulder pain : 1) history of shoulder surgery, dislocations, fractures or capsulitis, 2) full thickness rotator cuff tear identified by imagery or clinical tests (lag signs and gross weakness).
5 concepts to explore on this page · up to 1,300 pointsTap any term to learn what it means.

In plain language

Assembled directly from this trial’s registry record. Every sentence traces to a field below — nothing here is generated or interpreted.

Learning 
What this study is

This study is testing a treatment for a condition.

This study is not organised into the usual phase numbers — that is common for device, behavioural, and diagnostic research.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.designInfo.primaryPurpose
  • designModule.phases
Who receives what

There are 3 groups in this study.

Group A receives Stepped care.

Registry label: A: Stepped Care Group

Group B, the comparison group, receives Rehabilitation Care.

Registry label: B: Usual Rehabilitation Care Group

Group C, the comparison group, receives Medical Care.

Registry label: C: Usual Medical Care Group

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].label
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
How the study is run

Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.

Neither you nor the study team would know which group you are in until the study ends.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.designInfo.allocation
  • designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
Is there a placebo?

This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.

One group receives an existing treatment, so the two can be compared.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
Who the study is looking for

The study lists an age range of 18 years to 65 years.

The study is open to people of any sex.

The study does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.

These are the criteria the study lists. Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.maximumAge
  • eligibilityModule.sex
  • eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How big and how long

The study aims to enrol about 369 people.

The study is currently expected to finish around July 2028.

The main measurement is taken over: 24 weeks after baselineBaselineYour starting measurements, taken before treatment begins.Read more →.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
  • statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
What the study measures

Functional limitations — measured over 24 weeks after baselineBaselineYour starting measurements, taken before treatment begins.Read more →.

From the trial registry

Built from these fields:

  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].measure
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame

Source: NCT06832852 on ClinicalTrials.gov. The full registry text is further down this page — this summary never replaces it.

Not medical advice. What do these terms mean?

What is being tested — in plain terms

About Stepped careOther

During the first education session, participants will be provided with information pertaining to painful area, basic pain science, injury specific advice on load management, pain and activity management, lifestyle factors and physical activity. A general physical activity will be recommended (150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week). Then, participants will be directed to a website developed by the research team and patient partners. The website includes explanations of the various topics discussed during the session , explanatory videos, and summarized information. During the second educational session, the participant's condition will be reviewed, and their understanding of the topics covered in the first session and on the website will be assessed. A follow-up on the website will also be conducted. The physiotherapist will then answer the participant's questions and provide personalized advice based on their condition, along with long-term recommendations.

From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.

What a other is here: An intervention the registry did not place in another category.

Read the full explanation → · in clinical review

About Rehabilitation CareOther

The pragmatic rehabilitation program will include exercises aimed at improving strength, endurance, flexibility, capacity to sustain mechanical load and dynamic control. Manual therapy may be provided during the sessions, based on pragmatic clinical decision-making. Participants will also receive information pertaining to the painful area and advice on pain and load management, and on activity modification, integrated across the sessions.

From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.

What a other is here: An intervention the registry did not place in another category.

Read the full explanation → · in clinical review

About Medical CareOther

The pragmatic medical intervention may include pharmacological management, education, physiotherapy referral or referral to a specialist as deemed necessary.

From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.

What a other is here: An intervention the registry did not place in another category.

Read the full explanation → · in clinical review

Common questions

Answered from this trial’s registry record. Where the record doesn’t say, these answers say so rather than filling the gap.

Am I eligible for this trial?

Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part. Concord cannot make that determination, and neither can any tool that has not examined you.

What the study lists: an age range of 18 years to 65 years.

The full inclusionInclusion criteriaThe things you must have or be for a study to consider you.Read more → and exclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaThe things that would prevent someone from taking part.Read more → are published on this page, exactly as the study team wrote them.

The useful next step is to bring this trial to your doctor. Answering a few questions first gives them something concrete to review.

From the trial registry
  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.maximumAge
  • eligibilityModule.eligibilityCriteria
Is there a placebo?

This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.

One group receives an existing treatment so the two can be compared.

From the trial registry
  • armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
Would I know which treatment I am getting?

Neither you nor the study team would know which group you are in until the study ends.

Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.

From the trial registry
  • designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
  • designModule.designInfo.allocation
Who can join?

The study lists an age range of 18 years to 65 years.

It is open to people of any sex.

It does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.

Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can confirm whether a particular person can take part.

From the trial registry
  • eligibilityModule.minimumAge
  • eligibilityModule.maximumAge
  • eligibilityModule.sex
  • eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How long would this take?

The study's main measurement is taken over: 24 weeks after baselineBaselineYour starting measurements, taken before treatment begins.Read more →.

The study as a whole is currently expected to finish around 2028-07-31.

How long any one person takes part can differ from the study length. The study team can tell you what the schedule looks like in practice.

From the trial registry
  • outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
  • statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
How many people are taking part?

The study aims to enrol about 369 people.

From the trial registry
  • designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
Where is this happening?

This study lists one location: Québec, Quebec, Canada.

Sites can open and close during a study, so confirm with the team before travelling.

From the trial registry
  • trial_locations

About This Trial

As musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) reach epidemic proportions in Canada, access to the public health system for those who suffer from them is increasingly difficult. One of the main barriers is the delays to see a publicly funded health professional. New models of care must therefore be developed to ensure better access. We have previously shown that not all patients with a MSKD need to be closely followed by a health professional as for a large proportion of patients simply educating them is enough to resolve their MSKD. A stepped care model where education would be given first before deciding if patients need a more extensive follow-up should be explored. This project will compare the effectiveness of a Stepped Care Model to that of the two most widely used models of care: Usual Medical Care and Usual Rehabilitation Care. We think that a Stepped Care Model will be as effective to reduce functional limitations, but will lead to lower healthcare costs. Adults (n=369) with a MSKD will be randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups: Stepped Care, Usual Medical Care (physician-led intervention: e.g., advice/education, pharmacological pain management), or Usual Rehabilitation Care (physiotherapist-led intervention: e.g., advice/education, exercises). Participants in the Stepped Care Group will take part in two education sessions during the first 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, those who still have clinically important symptoms will receive follow-up rehabilitation interventions, while those who don't will be considered recovered and will have no further intervention. Primary (functional limitations) and secondary (e.g., pain, quality of life) outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks, and costs estimate will be established for each model of care. Knowing the urgent need for an overhaul of services to reduce wait times, the Stepped Care Model proposed could be a solution to improve access to health services without compromising quality of care.

Think this trial might be right for you?

Complete a quick intake form and we will match you with this and other relevant trials based on your medical profile.

See if this trial could fit you

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility can only be determined by the trial site after proper screening. Trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and may not reflect the most current status. Always consult your healthcare provider before making decisions about clinical trial participation.