Comparing T-piece resuscitator with Ventilator derived positive pressure for neonatal resuscitation
Official title: Manual T-piece Versus Ventilator Positive Pressure Ventilation During Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Neonates
A Cluster Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial of Manual T-piece Versus Ventilator Positive Pressure Ventilation During Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Neonates: The MVP Trial
- 2 groups
- Sites in Calgary, Edmonton and 5 more cities
- Recruiting
Interventions
- Medical device
Ventilator derived positive pressure ventilation - V-PPV
The clinical team will determine the need for PPV, as per local practice and Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Each site will be previously randomized to their method of providing PPV for preterm neonates during the first 10 minutes after birth. Ventilator delivered positive pressure ventilation (V-PPV) using a nasal interface will be delivered to the infant in the resuscitation room.
- Medical device
T-piece resuscitator (TPR)
The clinical team will determine the need for PPV, as per local practice and Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Each site will be previously randomized to their method of providing PPV for preterm neonates during the first 10 minutes after birth. PPV will be provided with a T-piece resuscitator (Neopuff, Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare) connected to an appropriately sized face-mask.
Canadian Sites (8)
6 of 8 recruiting
- Recruiting
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta
- Recruiting
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta
- Recruiting
McMaster Children's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario
- Recruiting
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
- Recruiting
Montreal Children's Hospital
Montral, Quebec
- Recruiting
CHU Sainte Justine
Montreal, Quebec
- Not yet recruiting
BC Children's and Women's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
- Not yet recruiting
Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario
Eligibility Criteria
See who this study is looking for7 criteria
The trial’s own eligibility text, word for word from the registry. Only the trial site can say who takes part.
Inclusion
- +GA 25+0 to 28+6 weeks using the best available obstetrical estimate
- +Designated to receive full resuscitation, i.e., not pre-determined to receive only comfort care
- +Received PPV as determined by the resuscitation team during the first 10 minutes of birth
Exclusion
- −Outborn birth status
- −Resuscitation performed in unforeseen circumstances outside typical delivery room (e.g., emergency department, antenatal ward)
- −Known major congenital or chromosomal anomaly
- −Established spontaneous respiration without receipt of PPV
In plain language
Assembled directly from this trial’s registry record. Every sentence traces to a field below — nothing here is generated or interpreted.
What this study is
This study is testing a treatment for a condition.
This study is not organised into the usual phase numbers — that is common for device, behavioural, and diagnostic research.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- designModule.designInfo.primaryPurpose
- designModule.phases
Who receives what
There are 2 groups in this study.
Group A, the comparison group, receives T-piece resuscitator (TPR).
Registry label: A: Control group (T-Piece Resuscitator)
Group B receives Ventilator derived positive pressure ventilation - V-PPV.
Registry label: B: Intervention under investigation (Ventilator delivered PPV)
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].label
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
How the study is run
Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.
One group of people involved — usually the participants — is not told which treatment is which.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- designModule.designInfo.allocation
- designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
Is there a placebo?
This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.
One group receives an existing treatment, so the two can be compared.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].interventionNames
Who the study is looking for
The study lists an age range of 25 weeks to 29 weeks.
The study is open to people of any sex.
The study does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.
These are the criteria the study lists. Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- eligibilityModule.minimumAge
- eligibilityModule.maximumAge
- eligibilityModule.sex
- eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How big and how long
The study aims to enrol about 780 people.
The study is currently expected to finish around January 2029.
The main measurement is taken over: From enrollmentEnrolmentThe number of participants a study plans to include, or has included.Read more → through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age).
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
- statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
What the study measures
Composite of pre-discharge mortality — measured over From enrollmentEnrolmentThe number of participants a study plans to include, or has included.Read more → through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age).
Major neuro-injury — measured over From enrollment through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age).
Moderate-severe BPD — measured over At 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.
From the trial registry
Built from these fields:
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].measure
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
Source: NCT06849596 on ClinicalTrials.gov. The full registry text is further down this page — this summary never replaces it.
Not medical advice. What do these terms mean?
What is being tested — in plain terms
About Ventilator derived positive pressure ventilation - V-PPVDevice
The clinical team will determine the need for PPV, as per local practice and Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Each site will be previously randomized to their method of providing PPV for preterm neonates during the first 10 minutes after birth. Ventilator delivered positive pressure ventilation (V-PPV) using a nasal interface will be delivered to the infant in the resuscitation room.
From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.
What a device is here: A physical instrument, implant, app or piece of equipment being studied.
Read the full explanation → · in clinical review
About T-piece resuscitator (TPR)Device
The clinical team will determine the need for PPV, as per local practice and Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Each site will be previously randomized to their method of providing PPV for preterm neonates during the first 10 minutes after birth. PPV will be provided with a T-piece resuscitator (Neopuff, Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare) connected to an appropriately sized face-mask.
From the trial registry — its own words, unedited.
What a device is here: A physical instrument, implant, app or piece of equipment being studied.
Read the full explanation → · in clinical review
Common questions
Answered from this trial’s registry record. Where the record doesn’t say, these answers say so rather than filling the gap.
Am I eligible for this trial?
Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can decide whether someone can take part. Concord cannot make that determination, and neither can any tool that has not examined you.
What the study lists: an age range of 25 weeks to 29 weeks.
The full inclusionInclusion criteriaThe things you must have or be for a study to consider you.Read more → and exclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaThe things that would prevent someone from taking part.Read more → are published on this page, exactly as the study team wrote them.
The useful next step is to bring this trial to your doctor. Answering a few questions first gives them something concrete to review.
From the trial registry
- eligibilityModule.minimumAge
- eligibilityModule.maximumAge
- eligibilityModule.eligibilityCriteria
Is there a placebo?
This study does not list a placeboPlaceboA dummy treatment with no active medicine, used for comparison.Read more → group.
One group receives an existing treatment so the two can be compared.
From the trial registry
- armsInterventionsModule.armGroups[].type
Would I know which treatment I am getting?
One group of people involved — usually the participants — is not told which treatment is which.
Which group you would be placed in is decided by chance, like a coin flip — not by you and not by your doctor.
From the trial registry
- designModule.designInfo.maskingInfo.masking
- designModule.designInfo.allocation
Who can join?
The study lists an age range of 25 weeks to 29 weeks.
It is open to people of any sex.
It does not accept healthy volunteersHealthy volunteerSomeone without the condition being studied who takes part anyway.Read more →.
Only the trial siteTrial siteA hospital or clinic where a study is actually run.Read more → can confirm whether a particular person can take part.
From the trial registry
- eligibilityModule.minimumAge
- eligibilityModule.maximumAge
- eligibilityModule.sex
- eligibilityModule.healthyVolunteers
How long would this take?
The study's main measurement is taken over: From enrollmentEnrolmentThe number of participants a study plans to include, or has included.Read more → through study completion (up to 50 weeks postmenstrual age).
The study as a whole is currently expected to finish around 2029-01-01.
How long any one person takes part can differ from the study length. The study team can tell you what the schedule looks like in practice.
From the trial registry
- outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[].timeFrame
- statusModule.completionDateStruct.date
How many people are taking part?
The study aims to enrol about 780 people.
From the trial registry
- designModule.enrollmentInfo.count
Where is this happening?
This study lists 8 locations, including: Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; London, Ontario, Canada; Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and 2 more.
Sites can open and close during a study, so confirm with the team before travelling.
From the trial registry
- trial_locations
About This Trial
Many extremely premature infants require immediate help with breathing after birth. Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) using a device called a T-piece resuscitator is a common method. PPV is needed to establish proper lung function, improve gas exchange, and encourage the infant to breathe spontaneously. However, T-piece resuscitators have limitations, like a lack of visual feedback and variable settings, which may result in reduced effectiveness of PPV. Improving PPV effectiveness may reduce the need for more invasive procedures, such as intubation, which pose an increased risk of complications and death for these fragile infants. A novel approach, that may overcome the above limitations and deliver PPV with precise settings through a nasal mask, is to use a ventilator to deliver PPV (V-PPV) using a respiratory mode called nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). While NIPPV is commonly used in neonatal intensive care units to support breathing in premature infants, the impact of V-PPV use during immediate post-birth stabilization needs to be studied. Preliminary data from our recent single-center study confirmed the feasibility of using V-PPV for resuscitation of extremely premature babies and indicated its potential superiority with a 28% decrease in the need for intubation compared to historical use of T-piece. This promising innovation may enhance outcomes for these vulnerable infants by refining the way we provide respiratory support in their critical first moments. The research objective is to compare the clinical outcomes of extremely premature infants receiving manual T-piece versus V-PPV during immediate post-birth stabilization. The primary aim is to evaluate the impact of V-PPV on major health complications or death. This study seeks to provide insights into improving the care and outcomes of these infants during a critical stage of transition from fetus to newborn.
Think this trial might be right for you?
Complete a quick intake form and we will match you with this and other relevant trials based on your medical profile.
See if this trial could fit youThis page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility can only be determined by the trial site after proper screening. Trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and may not reflect the most current status. Always consult your healthcare provider before making decisions about clinical trial participation.